LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
The following abbreviations are frequently used in this document:
CMA Catchment Management Area
CMS Catchment Management Strategy
DSS Decision Support System
DWAF Department of Water and Sanitation, South Africa
EMC Environmental Management Class
NWA (1998) National Water Act of 1998
NWRS National Water Resource Strategy
SEA Strategic Environmental Assessment
SG Scenario Generator
WMA Water Management Area
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
LIST OF TABLES |
v |
|||
LIST OF FIGURES |
vi |
|||
1. |
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES |
1 |
||
2. |
WHAT IS MEANT BY DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM? |
4 |
||
3. |
DSS DESIGNED TO SUPPORT THE SEA IN IMPLEMENTING THE NATIONAL WATER ACT (1998) |
6 |
||
4. |
INFORMATION ACQUISITION |
7 |
||
5. |
PROBLEM STRUCTURING |
8 |
||
6. |
DEFINING THE PROBLEM |
9 |
||
7. |
INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS |
12 |
||
7.1 |
Information Required to Set Up a Catchment Management Strategy |
12 |
||
7.2 |
Information Required to Assess Individual License Applications |
15 |
||
7.3 |
Modelling Requirements |
16 |
||
7.3.1 |
Generic modelling requirements needed to foster stakeholder interaction |
17 |
||
7.3.2 |
Modelling requirements in the DSS designed to support the CMA |
17 |
||
7.3.3 |
Modelling requirements to assist in compiling the CMS and associated allocation plan |
17 |
||
7.3.4 |
Current water use in the catchments |
19 |
||
7.3.5 |
Modelling projected water demands and developmental constraints |
20 |
||
7.3.6 |
Modelling required for the assessment of individual license applications |
21 |
||
7.3.7 |
Assessment of modelling methodologies currently used by DWAF |
22 |
||
7.3.8 |
Assessment of models used by DWAF in terms of the DSS design |
24 |
||
7.3.9 |
Selection of hydrological model to use in WMA DSS |
33 |
||
7.4 |
Water Quality Considerations |
36 |
||
7.4.1 |
Background in terms of the National Water Act (1998) |
37 |
||
7.4.2 |
Data required to address water quality issues |
38 |
||
7.4.3 |
Modelling water quality issues |
39 |
||
7.4.4 |
Models currently used for water quality modelling |
41 |
||
7.4.5 |
SWOT analysis of water quality modelling and monitoring in a WMA |
43 |
||
7.5 |
Data Requirements for the SEA-DSS |
44 |
||
7.5.1 |
Invariant data requirements |
45 |
||
7.5.2 |
Variant data requirements |
45 |
||
7.5.3 |
Ecological data requirements |
46 |
||
7.5.4 |
Economic data requirements |
47 |
||
7.6 |
Basis and Requirements for a Common Database |
47 |
||
7.6.1 |
Temporal and spatial scale considerations |
50 |
||
7.6.2 |
Database requirements for the DSS |
50 |
||
8. |
DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTERACTIVE, GENERIC, HYDROLOGICALLY FOCUSSED SCENARIO GENERATOR |
54 |
||
8.1 |
Responsibilities and Challenges Faced by the DWAF SEA |
54 |
||
8.2 |
A Generic, Hydrologically Focussed Scenario Generator |
57 |
||
8.3 |
Delineating Water Use Activities |
59 |
||
8.3.1 |
Delineating water use activities: Hydrological considerations |
59 |
||
8.3.2 |
Delineating water use activities: The location of the water use activity |
61 |
||
8.3.3 |
Delineating water use activities: Environmental considerations |
62 |
||
8.3.4 |
Delineating water use activities: Social considerations |
62 |
||
8.3.5 |
Delineating water use activities: Economic considerations |
62 |
||
8.4 |
Water Demand and Supply Scenarios |
65 |
||
8.4.1 |
Direct control of water demand via water use licenses and license conditions |
65 |
||
8.5 |
Scenarios Relating to Engineering Structures and the Operating Rules Associated to Engineering Structures |
66 |
||
8.6 |
Technical Challenges Faced by the Development of the SG: Stand-Alone and Linked Scenarios |
67 |
||
8.7 |
The Use, Potential Limitations and Opportunities of the Scenario Generator |
68 |
||
9. |
EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES |
70 |
||
10. |
ANALYSIS OF DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS |
73 |
||
10.1 |
Literature Review of the Different DSSs Used in South Africa |
68 |
||
10.2 |
Analysis of DSSs Available |
77 |
||
11. |
DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN |
79 |
||
11.1 |
Database Structure |
79 |
||
11.2 |
Processing Component |
82 |
||
11.2.1 |
Scenario generator and attribute builder implementation plan |
83 |
||
11.2.2 |
Modelling tools required in the processing phase of the implementation plan |
84 |
||
11.3 |
Visualisation Component |
87 |
||
12. |
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS |
89 |
||
13. |
REFERENCES |
95 |
||
14. |
REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED SEA-DSS IN THE LIGHT OF GÖRGENS (2001) GUIDELINES FOR WATER RESOURCES MODELLING PROCEDURES TO SUPPORT WATER MANAGEMENT INSTITUTIONS |
98 |
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table 1 |
Summary table of the attributes of models used by DWAF |
34 |
Table 2 |
Types of information required by a potential SEA client. The column on the right comments on how a scenario-generator developed in ArcView may be used to meet these information requirements |
59 |
Table 3 |
Examples of water using activities and some important considerations |
60 |
Table 4 |
An example of the division of water use into categories necessary for the scenario generator to permit specific scenarios to be generated which are consistent with the objectives of the National Water Act (1998) |
63 |
Table 5 |
Summary table of attributes of the DSSs analysed in this document |
77 |
Table 6 |
Review of the proposed SEA-DSS in comparison to the Görgens (2001) report |
98 |
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Figure 1 |
Schematic representation of the decision making process (adapted from Görgens and Jewitt, 2000 and Stewart et al., 2000) |
5 |
Figure 2 |
The problem structuring phase of the decision support framework |
8 |
Figure 3 |
Criteria to be considered for the assessment of water use licenses |
9 |
Figure 4 |
Considerations and information requirements needed for the development of a catchment allocation plan |
12 |
Figure 5 |
A complex approach to database management |
49 |
Figure 6 |
A simple approach to database management |
49 |
Figure 7 |
Major components of the DSS design |
79 |
Figure 8 |
Some of the invariant and variant data requirements for the DSS |
81 |
Figure 9 |
The processing component of the DSS |
83 |
Figure 10 |
Economic modelling component of the DSS |
85 |
Figure 11 |
The visualisation component of the DSS and the linkages to the database and processing components |
87 |